How to fix the datetime2 out-of-range conversion error

If I want to run the application, I get the error message in the title and the contract entity.SaveChanges() is in red. Papy Hello, you can move the thread in any forum you like, but I personally find that this forum is mainly hleful, because Sreekar and Alok Parmesh presence. This occurs when the Person is stored associated with the table, has a mandatory datetime field, and you do not set it with a value. I had solved the same error on inserting values to the datetime-fields the Problem was.This occurs if the not null datetime are mapped to fields a correct value. I was pleasantly surprised to see that EF knew SQL to ignore this null on INSERT, and then use the date from the server ( GetDate() ). I mean, the primary DBs are only two, but the data will then be crunched and statistical results, even for very large, distributed them among the other DBs. On the other hand, your answers may be, because you 2 options, instead of the usual, initialize the field with the value min. The table in question, the one that is in trouble, is filled once a day with only one line, so there is no need to use it. Apply property changes applies changes to all properties of the object, including its non initialized date time, 0001-01-01, which is outside the range of SQL Server DATETIME. If you delete ither in the table and re-create it or use a bcp command, a good data would be best. We had the same problem here, and from what we have found, fill in all the date fields and change the data type, are the most common solutions. This is yet another dimension and another headache for me, in addition to many other the other advice? Thank you. If your DateTime property in the code set to zero (e.g. DateTime? or allows null values ), the insert command will attempt to insert a NULL instead of an out-of-range date. In my intuitive understanding, that it is somehow a bug in the table properties change and one of them I have way to all the properties of a table with Sql and can't see a difference between two adjacent tables: one with no problems and the. For us, this was preferable, even, because we needed more consistency on the server, without worrying about the clock differences between the web server and the sql server.

Keep in mind that, in the case of a dependency property, you should also make sure that is dependent on the property type, a nullable DateTime type. The statement has been terminated to solve 0 MVC - How SqlException: The conversion of a datetime2 data type to a datetime data type resulted in an out-of-range value.. Make sure the default-value is greater than or equal to SqlDateTime.MinValue ( from 1. January 1753 to 31. December 9999). And really DateTime2?? - You could not only upgrade the DateTime you had added to create a new data type, and the awesome 2. I noticed that the data from three tables, stayed for about a month or two months (different dates for tables). However, when I check the tables in the SSMS I can see that one of them, the very table that caused the exception, these fields unchanged: DateTime. Since the question about DateCreated and datemodified, this will be GETDATE likely than DEFAULT(). If you must do this to ensure that these fields lay the car are ignored in the mapper, otherwise the database will be updated with null for these fields, if they are not supplied from the view.

I tried to repeat the process, this time with a routine that changes the column type individually column by column. My solution was to turn all datetime columns to datetime2, and use datetime2 for all of the new columns, in other words, EF will use datetime2 by default. I assume that the edit method tries to update the value sent in the DB is edited, but to not like it for some reason. And I read the exception correctly: you can not some of the values from the Sql DateTime2, Sql DateTime convert. He discovered, to my amazement, I that ALL of the fields in the defects table should be changed, have indeed been changed to DateTime2. For those who modify a DateTime, DateTime2 value is not an option (as is the case with SQL2005 users), I think that in most cases, it makes more sense to fill out fields empty something like. I would check what the min date that is handed to you, and if your tables have, datetime2 or datetime data type columns. A null date will not be forced to a point in time that the opportunity would not have even in the range of the SQL DateTime type with a default value. When you insert a new object with EF4, I got this error message, because I was not passing a DateTime property on my object explicitly. The problem is when you read a Sql DateTime2 in a.Net DateTime or write a.Net DateTime value in a Sql DateTime2, since their areas are the same.